Medical Hypotheses
Volume 59, Issue 1 , Pages 76-78, July 2002

Addendum to a note regarding the success of biological and medical science

  • K.M Anderson

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Il 60612, USA
    • Department of Biochemistry, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Il 60612, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: K.M. Anderson, Section of Medical Oncology, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Phone: +312-942-6423; Fax: +312-942-3192
  • ,
  • J.E Harris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Il 60612, USA

Received 15 June 2001; accepted 1 November 2001.

Abstract 

Much like mathematics, the biological and medical sciences seem unreasonably successful, considering many potential obstacles to this outcome. A recent suggestion that data should be viewed as `quantized', that each `elementary system' contains a single `bit' of information (A. Zeilinger, A foundational principle for quantum mechanics, Foundations of Physics 29 (1999) 631), would seem ultimately to underlie the coherent relationships between the perceived physical universe and mental constructs within and among mathematics, logic, the `hard' sciences and those `softer' sciences directly based on biochemical and physiologic mechanisms (A. Zeilinger, A foundational principle for quantum mechanics, Foundations of Physics 29 (1999) 631; H. C.Von Baeyer, In the beginning was the bit, New Scientist, 17 (2000) 26–30).

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0306-9877(02)00112-3

Medical Hypotheses
Volume 59, Issue 1 , Pages 76-78, July 2002