Medical Hypotheses
Volume 59, Issue 4 , Pages 385-388, October 2002

Evidence that failure to conceive despite apparent correction of ovulatory defects by follicle-maturing drugs may be related to premature trophoblast invasion

  • J.H Check

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Jerome H. Check MD, PhD, 7447 Old York Road, Melrose Park, PA 19027, USA. Phone: 215-635-4400; Fax: 215-635-2304
  • ,
  • M.L Check

The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology & Infertility, Camden, New Jersey, USA

Received 8 May 2001; accepted 1 November 2001.

Abstract 

There is evidence that follicle-maturing drugs, especially when used for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (IVF–ET) purposes, may be associated with lower pregnancy rates following ET related to a hostile uterine environment. It was assumed that this was related to implantation failure of the embryos. However, there is a possibility that the embryo may implant too soon into a uterine environment not ready for the invading trophoblast. To test this hypothesis a 34kDa protein known as the progesterone-induced blocking factor (PIBF), which only rises after trophoblast invasion, was measured at the peri-implantation time 3 days after ET. The results showed a marked reduction in pregnancy rates per transfer in those positive for PIBF at this time especially in those receiving controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Thus, these data suggested that premature trophoblast invasion rather than failure for embryos to implant may be the etiologic factor responsible for the adverse effect of controlled ovarian stimulation in the uterine environment.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0306-9877(02)00126-3

Medical Hypotheses
Volume 59, Issue 4 , Pages 385-388, October 2002