Medical Hypotheses
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 703-705, 12 November 2002

Cellular telephones and effects on the brain: The head as an antenna and brain tissue as a radio receiver

  • Z. Weinberger

      Affiliations

    • Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel
    • No financial interest related to topic.
  • ,
  • E.D. Richter

      Affiliations

    • Hebrew University-Hadassah, Jerusalem, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Elihu D Richter MD, MPH, POB 12272, Unit of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Hebrew University-Hadassah, Ein Kerem Campus, Jerusalem, Israel. Phone: 972-2-6758147; Fax: 972-2-6784010
    • EDR has served as an expert witness on behalf of a patient with brain cancer and prior exposure to cell phones, but this paper is based on a draft which predates his first connection with the suit by more than a year.

Received 23 April 2002

Abstract 

Headache and other neuropsychological symptoms occur in users of cellular telephones, and controversy exists concerning risks for brain cancer. We hypothesize these effects result from the head serving as an antenna and brain tissue as a radio receiver. The frequencies for transmission and reception by cellular telephones, about 900MHz for analog and 1800MHz for digital transmission, have wavelengths of 33–35 and 16–17cm, respectively. Human heads are oval in shape with a short axis about 16 to 17cm in length. Near the ear there will be a cross-section in the head with an axis half the wavelength of RF/MW transmissions of 900MHz and equal to the wavelength of RF/MW transmissions at 1800MHz.

Therefore, the human head can serve as a lossy resonator for the electromagnetic radiation emitted by the cellular telephone, absorbing much of the energy specifically from these wavelengths. Brain cells and tissues demodulate the cell-phone’s audio frequencies from the radio frequency carrier. Low audio frequencies in the ranges of α and β waves affect these waves and thereby influence brain function. These effects state the case for a precautionary policy.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0306-9877(02)00298-0

Medical Hypotheses
Volume 59, Issue 6 , Pages 703-705, 12 November 2002