Medical Hypotheses
Volume 62, Issue 3 , Pages 342-345, March 2004

A new therapeutic approach for the treatment of sepsis

Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey

Received 23 January 2003; accepted 4 November 2003.

Abstract 

Despite important advances in understanding its pathophysiology, therapy for septic shock remains largely symptomatic and supportive. Aiming to elevate the systemic arterial blood pressure by using vasoconstrictor manoeuvers are preferred without paying much attention to the ischaemia produced at the peripheral tissues. Since, these maneuvers proved no remarkable success in reducing the mortality up to date, we now propose a different perspective in this manuscript. Although it is not always easy to distinguish the different phases of septic shock, at least two fundamentally different phases can be distinguished, i.e. (i) hyperdynamic phase and (ii) hypodynamic phase mandating the adoption of vasodilative and vasoconstrictive interventions, consequently. Additionally, endothelium-derived vasodilator and vasoconstrictor substances such as nitric oxide and endothelin play key roles in systemic inflammatory response syndrome that lead to fatal multiple organ dysfunction. Therefore, we hypothesize that the inhibition of nitric oxide production during earlier phases of septic shock combined with the blockade of endothelin receptors at later stages appear feasible and a novel strategy for the therapy of septic shock.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0306-9877(03)00365-7

doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2003.11.009

Medical Hypotheses
Volume 62, Issue 3 , Pages 342-345, March 2004