Medical Hypotheses
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 1173-1176, 2005

Significant reduction of the risk of venous thromboembolism in all long term immobile patients a few months after the onset of immobility

Rehabilitation Medicine, Neurological Rehabilitation, Greater Manchester Neuro-rehabilitation Network, Leigh Infirmary, The Avenue Leigh, Lancs 7 1HS, UK

Received 16 November 2004; accepted 22 November 2004. published online 04 January 2005.

Summary 

Prophylactic anticoagulation is a standard practice in patients with sudden lower limbs paralysis. Thromboprophylaxis is usually continued until the patient regains independent mobility. The duration of anticoagulation in long-term immobile patients is unknown. Spinal cord injury patients are the only population that was comprehensively studied and prophylactic anticoagulation is discontinued after 4 months as the risk of venous thromboembolism drops dramatically after 3–4 months. Development of muscle spasticity has been traditionally considered to be the reason for this low risk as lower limbs spasticity/spasms might be able to improve the calf muscle pump action. We are presenting the evidence from physiological studies of the lower limbs vascular system that cast doubt over this explanation and present an alternative hypothesis backed by several clinical circumstantial evidence suggesting that the vascular changes following long term lower limbs inactivity which are universal to all immobile patients is probably the main protecting factor. We suggest that prophylactic anticoagulation is necessary only on the first 4 months following the acute onset of immobility in all neurologically impaired immobile patients regardless of their muscle tone state.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0306-9877(04)00642-5

doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2004.11.035

Medical Hypotheses
Volume 64, Issue 6 , Pages 1173-1176, 2005