Random number generation and creativity

Summary 

A previous paper suggested that humans can generate genuinely random numbers. I tested this hypothesis by repeating the experiment with a larger number of highly numerate subjects, asking them to call out a sequence of digits selected from 0 through 9. The resulting sequences were substantially non-random, with an excess of sequential pairs of numbers and a deficit of repeats of the same number, in line with previous literature. However, the previous literature suggests that humans generate random numbers with substantial conscious effort, and distractions which reduce that effort reduce the randomness of the numbers. I reduced my subjects’ concentration by asking them to call out in another language, and with alcohol – neither affected the randomness of their responses. This suggests that the ability to generate random numbers is a ‘basic’ function of the human mind, even if those numbers are not mathematically ‘random’. I hypothesise that there is a ‘creativity’ mechanism, while not truly random, provides novelty as part of the mind’s defence against closed programming loops, and that testing for the effects seen here in people more or less familiar with numbers or with spontaneous creativity could identify more features of this process. It is possible that training to perform better at simple random generation tasks could help to increase creativity, through training people to reduce the conscious mind’s suppression of the ‘spontaneous’, creative response to new questions.