Medical Hypotheses
Volume 70, Issue 4 , Pages 709-713, 2008

Stimulating revolutionary science with mega-cash prizes

Editor-in-Chief – Medical Hypotheses, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK

Editorial Advisory Board – Medical Hypotheses, Newcastle University, NE1 7RU, UK

published online 20 February 2008.

Summary 

We argue that the most ambitious science is intrinsically riskier science, more likely to fail. It is almost always a safer career strategy for the best scientists to seek to extend knowledge more modestly and to build incrementally on existing ideas and methods. Therefore, higher rewards for success are a necessary incentive to encourage top scientists to work on the most important scientific problems, ones where the solution has potentially revolutionary implications. We suggest that mega-cash prizes (measured in tens of millions of dollars) are a suitable reward for those individuals (or institutions) whose work has triggered radically new directions in science.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0306-9877(08)00006-6

doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.01.001

Medical Hypotheses
Volume 70, Issue 4 , Pages 709-713, 2008