Medical Hypotheses
Volume 54, Issue 1 , Pages 18-25, January 2000

What are the implications of the interaction between DDT and estrogen receptors in the body?

Graduate School of Health Sciences, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, U.S.A.

Received 25 May 1998; accepted 25 August 1998.

Revised

Abstract 

The organochlorine pesticide, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), which is fat-soluble and persistent in the body and environment, has estrogenic activity. There has been an apparent association with breast cancer, which has implicated DDT binding with estrogen receptors (ERs).

The mechanism of DDT–ER interaction at target sites is similar to estrogen, with protein synthesis resulting in an estrogenic response. Other than the female reproductive sites, DDT could possibly bind to ERs present in other body systems. The recent discovery of a β receptor has introduced a new understanding of estrogen and DDT binding.

An understanding of the molecular biology of the DDT–ER interaction in breast tissue could possibly explain the risk of breast cancer. Estrogen and other estrogenic compounds compete with DDT by their estrogenic potential.

DDT–ER interaction in the body has wider implications in terms of its genotoxic potential and role in carcinogenesis.

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0306-9877(98)90811-8

doi:10.1054/mehy.1998.0811

Medical Hypotheses
Volume 54, Issue 1 , Pages 18-25, January 2000